More action needed on recyclable plastics

Recyclable plastic has been recorded on popular beaches and urban watercourses in Adelaide, South Australia – highlighting the need for more efforts to remove and reuse all plastics from waste streams, particularly in urban areas.

Flinders University researcher Anna Hayes sampling sand for microplastics and other polymers.

Flinders University researchers extracted 417 microplastic particles from 285 samples of sediment from the Onkaparinga River and Patawalonga Creek as well as from sand at local metropolitan beaches, finding most of the microplastics were from recyclable products, and at a higher abundance of microplastics and other polymers in the sediment compared to less urbanised environments.

“Clearly plastic waste will be more abundant in urbanised areas but it’s concerning that we are finding more evidence of recyclable plastic pollution in our rivers, creeks and beaches,” says first author in a new article Anna Hayes, from the College of Science and Engineering.

The Flinders University researchers are calling for more efforts to reuse and recover recyclable plastics, also pointing to even higher levels in urban rivers and beaches in separate NSW, Queensland, WA and Victorian studies.

Microplastics found in the field seen under a light microscope.

“The study also highlights the need for development of research models to track microplastic movements in coastal and oceanic waters to provide a better understanding of how microplastics migrate once they leave rivers and creeks,” says Ms Hayes.

Microplastics are fragments of any type of plastic that cause pollution by entering natural ecosystems from a variety of sources. Microplastic particles were categorised by size (from 1-5mm), shape (fragment, fibre and sphere) and polymer types, with a range of 29 including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polystyrene (PS).

Distribution of microplastics in marine environments tends to be underestimated when mixed with sediment, while low density microplastics are also held in suspension in water – particularly in slow velocity rivers and streams, adds co-author College of Science and Engineering Associate Professor Sophie Leterme, from the Flinders Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology.

“In particular the water and sediment from the slow flowing Patawalonga Creek contained a higher level of microplastic compared to what we found at nearby Glenelg Beach, the Onkaparinga River and Southport Beach,” says Associate Professor Leterme.

“We need to improve our waste management practices and implement better recycling strategies to not only clean up urban environments but to also help improve coastal, marine and estuarine water quality.”

“This study also gives insight into how river flow is a major environmental influence on the accumulation of microplastics in river and beach sediment,” adds Professor of Forensic Science Paul Kirkbride, another co-author.

Plastics visible to the eye lying on the banks of the Patawalonga River, Adelaide South Australia.

The Flinders study found average sampling in the local survey to be an average of three samples in every 100,000 litres of water, and two pieces per kilogram in the beach sand sites tested.

By comparison, previous interstate studies by other research groups found 10-110 particles of microplastics per kilogram of sediment at a Brisbane River site, 245 in Perth agricultural stormwater, up to 147 particles in a Greater Melbourne wetland, and 96 in sediments tested at Port Jackson Bay, NSW.

The paper, Variation in polymer types and abundance of microplastics from two rivers and beaches in Adelaide, South Australia (2021), by Anna Hayes, Paul Kirkbride and Sophie C Leterme has been published in Marine Pollution Bulletin (Elsevier) DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112842

Posted in
College of Science and Engineering Research

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.