Talk and tweets offer a window into political thinking

ThadVoting along party lines obscures the opinions of individuals, so Professor Thad Kousser intends to use other indicators, including their tweets, to find out what our politicians really think.

The latest Visiting Fulbright Chair at Flinders, Professor Kousser (pictured) is using the prism of environmental policy, one of the most divisive issues in politics internationally, to examine the extent of polarisation in party politics in Australia.

Professor Kousser, from the University of California at San Diego, is based at Flinders for the next two months. He is the fifth scholar to visit under the Fulbright-Flinders Chair in American Political Science program.

Political polarisation – the adoption of intransigent, diametrically opposed policy views – has become a hallmark of US party politics in recent decades.

“The major parties in the US are moving further and further apart,” Professor Kousser said.

“A generation ago, the environment was something where the parties weren’t divided – it was more likely to cause division within parties. It was Richard Nixon, the conservative Republican president, who signed all the landmark environmental legislation in US history.”

Professor Kousser says that while the Australian political system is much more permeable and accessible than that of the US, the Australian convention of voting along party lines makes the real opinions of our politicians harder to gauge, particularly on issues such as climate change.

“In the United States, you measure polarisation by looking at how people vote in Congress. Because everything’s a conscience vote, you can see all the various shades of blue (Democrat) and red (Republican),” he said.

“Once you come out of the party room in Australia, you vote on party lines. So rather than look at how people vote, which is constrained, I’m going to look at what people say.”

Professor Kousser’s research will analyse politicians’ statements on the floor using Hansard, coding them for ideological content. In the modern era, thousands of tweets by politicians will also be analysed.

The research will compare statements on environmental issues from 1964 and 1974, and also 2004 and 2014.

He has also begun a series of interviews with politicians, and has spoken to State and Federal parliamentarians in Tasmania, Victoria and South Australia.

“I’ll be trying to get a sense of where the parties are and where they’re moving.”

Professor Kousser said the polls showed that voters do not divide neatly on party lines on environmental concerns, and that issues like fracking can leap political boundaries.

As well as conducting his research project, Professor Kousser will deliver Fulbright public lectures on the upcoming US presidential election in Brisbane, Darwin, Melbourne and Canberra during April and May, and he will present a report on his Australian research findings at a public lecture at Flinders University Victoria Square on June 18.

Posted in
Corporate Engage Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences International Research School of International Studies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *