Discounting the ‘leftie’ myth

mike-nichollsLeft-handed people consistently perform worse than right-handed people in measures of cognitive ability, or IQ, with the ‘level of disability’ equivalent to being prematurely born.

This is the finding of a recent study led by Professor Mike Nicholls (pictured), newly-appointed Director of the Brain and Cognition Laboratory in Flinders University’s School of Psychology, which dispels the common myth that left-handed people are more likely to be gifted.

“The evidence, based on our analyses of very large databases of handedness and other attributes in people across Australia, the UK and the USA, doesn’t bear out that myth,” Professor Nicholls said.

“Our study of members of the same family confirms that left-handed children will do worse than their right-handed siblings,” he said.

Professor Nicholls, who is himself left-handed, has been appointed to one of the new Strategic Professorships designed to bolster specific areas of research.

He joined Flinders in January after 17 years at the University of Melbourne.

Over that time, he was awarded seven large Australian Research Council grants for projects examining how the brain affects behaviour.

He said handedness is tied to left/right asymmetries in the brain, or laterality – a major research focus of the Laboratory.

“Left and right could so easily be the same in humans and in some animal species it is the same. In humans, though, there seems to be this large specialisation of the two sides of the brain,” he said.

“It is most likely related to squeezing as many eggs as possible into one basket.”

Spatial attention is the second research focus of the Laboratory team which includes postdoctoral fellows Tobias Loetscher from Switzerland and Nicole Thomas from Canada.

“We’re very interested in how the general population tends to pay more attention to the left-hand side of an object than the right,” Professor Nicholls said.

This bias manifests itself as a tendency to deviate to the right in activities from steering a wheelchair to walking and even goal-kicking.

“There is a difference between near and far space and how the brain codes what can and cannot be touched.

In the case of AFL footballers, when they aim for the midpoint between two posts, they tend to kick slightly to the right of middle.”

Professor Nicholls said the ultimate goal of his research is to develop remedial techniques for people with neurological problems such as ADHD and brain damage.

Posted in
Corporate Engage News Research

0 thoughts on “Discounting the ‘leftie’ myth

  1. I’m currently studying a Master in Cognitive Sciences, so I’m interested in the original article for this study. Where can I find it?
    Thank’s

  2. Hi! Does this mean that driving on the right hand side of the road makes more sense?
    Cheers, Heidi

  3. As a leftie, and the only one in my family, I consistantly perform higher in IQ tests than the rest of my family. Just think what could have been if I wasn’t a south paw!

  4. Ha! What a crock! I am left-handed myself, I have one left-handed brother and one right-handed brother. Guess who the higher IQ’s are? Yep, the lefties. I don’t think handed-ness has anything to do with it, and anyway, who cares?!

  5. The part of this story that will be picked up by news organizations is that lefties are not as bright as righties. The headline reads, “Discounting the “lefties” myth”, which is that they are gifted, however, the first paragraph swings all the way to that lefties have a level of disability. I realize this guy wants to make a name for himself in his field, I don’t believe that this is the way to do it. Suggesting that people who are left handed may have lower IQ’s will be used by others to categorize and sterotype people. I have twin boys who were pre-mature, one is left-handed and the other is right-handed and they both scored above average in educational testing. I think this article is unnecessary and does a disservice to people who are born left handed

  6. What does this research actually show? That the distribution of “lefties” across the ability range is at a consistently lower level than “righties” OR that “lefties” are less ‘average’ than “righties”, that they tend to be distributed at the extremes of the cognitive ability range with a larger number at the lower end than the higher? If so the question is: What accounts for that difference? Nature or nurture?

  7. I believe that Professor Nicholls’ research proves that the reason lefties score ‘badly’ on IQ tests is that IQ tests are not designed for creative people. It’s nothing to do with intelligence and all to do with bad IQ tests.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *